top of page

"Food Editing" The Sneaky Workaround Keeping Harmful Ingredients in Our Food. What If "Banned" Doesn’t Really Mean Gone?

  • Writer: Patti King
    Patti King
  • Mar 9
  • 3 min read

Updated: Apr 7



When countries like the European Union, Japan, and even China ban a food ingredient due to health risks, you’d expect the U.S. to follow suit. But instead of outright banning harmful additives, food manufacturers often find workarounds—a loophole that lets them continue using questionable ingredients under new names, slight modifications, or sneaky labeling tricks. This is food editing in action. It’s not exactly illegal, but it’s a deceptive way to keep risky ingredients in our food without full transparency. Let’s break down how this happens and why you should care.


1. Reformulating Instead of Removing

When an ingredient is banned or restricted, companies often slightly alter its molecular structure so it’s technically “new” and not subject to the ban.


Example: Trans Fat Disguised as Something Else


  • The FDA banned partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs)—a major source of trans fats—in 2018 due to their link to heart disease.

  • Instead of eliminating Trans Fats, companies switched to interesterified fats, which may be just as harmful, yet lack the same regulation.

  • Interesterified fats don’t have to be labeled as trans fats, keeping consumers in the dark.


Why It’s a Problem: This trick avoids regulation while keeping unhealthy fats in our food, still posing risks for heart disease and inflammation.


2. Renaming Ingredients to Confuse Consumers

Some companies change the name of an ingredient so it doesn’t raise red flags.


Example: High-Fructose Corn Syrup’s Disguise


  • High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), which has been linked to obesity, diabetes, and fatty liver disease, has gotten a bad reputation.

  • Some companies now call it “fructose” or “corn sugar” instead of HFCS.

  • Consumers looking to avoid HFCS may not realize it’s still in their food under a different name.


Why It’s a Problem: People who try to make healthier choices may still be consuming harmful additives without realizing it.


3. Bioengineered Foods That Don’t Have to Be Labeled

The USDA’s “Bioengineered” (BE) food label rule—which replaced GMO labels in 2022—sounds like it’s helping transparency, but it actually makes it harder to know if your food contains genetically modified ingredients.


Example: The QR Code Trick


  • Instead of transparency on-package labeling, many companies are allowed to use a QR code or a web link for consumers to “learn more” about bioengineered ingredients.

  • Highly processed foods made from GMO corn, soy, or sugar don’t even require a BE label—even though they come from genetically modified crops.

  • Most consumers don’t scan QR codes while shopping, leaving them unaware of what they’re really eating.


Why It’s a Problem: This loophole hides bioengineered ingredients from consumers who want to avoid them.


4. Nanofoods: A Hidden Risk That Isn’t Disclosed

Nanotechnology is now being used to alter food at the microscopic level to improve texture, shelf life, and appearance. However, there’s little research on its long-term effects, and no clear labeling requirements in the U.S.


Example: Titanium Dioxide in Candy


  • Titanium dioxide (E171), a whitening agent used in Skittles, Starburst, and processed foods, has been banned in the EU due to potential risks of DNA damage and inflammation.

  • The U.S. still allows it in food with no labeling requirement for consumers to know how much they’re consuming.

  • Lack of transparency in food labels means companies aren’t required to disclose when titanium dioxide is used in nanoparticle form, making it harder for consumers to make informed choices.


Why It’s a Problem: Consumers are unknowingly eating nano-sized particles that may pass into organs and the bloodstream, with unknown long-term health risks.


Why This Matters

The problem with food editing isn’t just that these ingredients exist—it’s that companies are using loopholes to keep them in our food while avoiding transparency. Consumers deserve clear, honest labeling. People should be able to make informed choices about what they eat. Just because an ingredient is “modified” doesn’t mean it’s safe. The next time you see a food ingredient you don’t recognize, it might just be a rebranded, reformulated, or hidden version of something that was already banned somewhere else.


What You Can Do:

  • Read ingredient labels carefully and learn alternative names for harmful additives.

  • Use apps like TREVBI (which I’m developing) to scan and analyze ingredients in your food.

  • Support food transparency laws that require clear labeling for all consumers.

If we don’t demand better, companies will keep finding ways to edit their ingredients—without telling us the truth.


If you enjoyed this blog, tap ❤️ comment below 💬 and share the love! 😊


Comments


Contact us

TREVBI LOGO 2.png
bottom of page